video made by me (sorry, about the sound...). watch on HD.
2013 m. kovo 3 d., sekmadienis
Ewert and The Two Dragons@Loftas
performance of the great Estonian band in Vilnius, Lithuania.
video made by me (sorry, about the sound...). watch on HD.
video made by me (sorry, about the sound...). watch on HD.
2013 m. kovo 1 d., penktadienis
Tallinn Black Nights Film Festival e-book and video blog
Here you can read all the e-book we did during "Nisimazine" workshop in PÖFF, the most influencial film festival in the area of Baltic countries.
And here are some videos from my video blog I did back then:
Interview with Jan Ole Gerster, director of the film "Oh Boy" (you can read full interview in the e-book, as well as the other ones). Here, I think I should assume, that I am a huge fan of the film and you should also see this film whenever you get a chance (sadly, Lithuanian audiences just missed this (or not) during German film days).
And here is the interview with Jana Wolff, the producer of "House With a Turret". It is a film by the Ukrainian director Eva Neymann, the cinematographer of the film is Lithuanian Rimvydas Leipus, also Yekaterina Golubeva appears in the film. In Lithuania, film was already shown in Kaunas International Film Festival.
Another interview. This time with the producer of "Eastalgia", Simon Amberger. If you someone from Lithuanian audiences would get interested, the film will be shown during Vilnius International Film Festival "Kino pavasaris" (VIFF).
"Greek cinema" is my personal project which I did during the workshop. The festival "In Focus" programme was concerned on Greek cinema, so I did a little research why and what is going on with Greek cinema that it took the attention. In the video some material from the trailer of the film "L" appears, so when you see it, you can have in mind that this film can be seen in VIFF. In the e-book Emilie Toomela gives a wider look on the "In Focus: Greek cinema".
And if to be getting ready for VIFF, I would recommend to read the reviews of "Eastalgia", "Loving", "A Caretaker`s Tale", "Laurence Anyways", "Compliance", "The Sessions", interview with Rusudan Chkonia, the director of "Keep Smiling" and, of course, everything else what might interest you.
E-book link again.
And here are some videos from my video blog I did back then:
Interview with Jan Ole Gerster, director of the film "Oh Boy" (you can read full interview in the e-book, as well as the other ones). Here, I think I should assume, that I am a huge fan of the film and you should also see this film whenever you get a chance (sadly, Lithuanian audiences just missed this (or not) during German film days).
And here is the interview with Jana Wolff, the producer of "House With a Turret". It is a film by the Ukrainian director Eva Neymann, the cinematographer of the film is Lithuanian Rimvydas Leipus, also Yekaterina Golubeva appears in the film. In Lithuania, film was already shown in Kaunas International Film Festival.
Another interview. This time with the producer of "Eastalgia", Simon Amberger. If you someone from Lithuanian audiences would get interested, the film will be shown during Vilnius International Film Festival "Kino pavasaris" (VIFF).
"Greek cinema" is my personal project which I did during the workshop. The festival "In Focus" programme was concerned on Greek cinema, so I did a little research why and what is going on with Greek cinema that it took the attention. In the video some material from the trailer of the film "L" appears, so when you see it, you can have in mind that this film can be seen in VIFF. In the e-book Emilie Toomela gives a wider look on the "In Focus: Greek cinema".
And if to be getting ready for VIFF, I would recommend to read the reviews of "Eastalgia", "Loving", "A Caretaker`s Tale", "Laurence Anyways", "Compliance", "The Sessions", interview with Rusudan Chkonia, the director of "Keep Smiling" and, of course, everything else what might interest you.
E-book link again.
2013 m. vasario 26 d., antradienis
2013 m. vasario 18 d., pirmadienis
“Juha“ – Worldwide Cinematic Phenomenon
“Juha“ (1999)
by Aki Kaurismäki“
Juhani
Aho`s classical Finnish novel “Juha“ (1911) was applied to cinema four times
and two times to operas. The novel got the attention also worldwide. The first
film version – silent film in 1921 was created by Swedish filmmakers, later versions
made by Finnish filmmakers. The latest version was made in 1999 by Aki
Kaurismäki. In his version he replaces the narrative from 17-18th century,
where originally it takes place, to 1970s and inverts some ideas originally
expressed in the novel on his own needs.
A farmer
Juha and his wife Marja lives their happy life in the Finnish countryside, but
soon one day Shemeikka with his elegant American car appears in the horizon. The car breaks and
while Juha fixes it, a new stranger tries to seduce his wife. She resists, but
later she realizes that he was a chance to have a life she is dreaming of, so
when he is back to the village, she escapes with him. At first, everything
looks perfect for her, but later he jails her in the brothel together with
other lovers. Marja decides to escape, but then she gets to know that she is
pregnant with Shemeikka`s child, so she stays. Meanwhile Juha is left alone in
the village suffering for the loss of his wife.
It
was not the first film when Kaurismäki took the classical novel and replaced it
to newer times – he did it with “Hamlet Goes Business” (1987) and “Crime and
Punishment” (1983). But he does not only replace the narrative, but also modernizes the characters and inverts the ideas
to nowadays. For example, in Kaurismäki`s “Juha” the idea of nationalism
(Shemeikka, trader from East Karelia – something evil (bad is something
connected to Russia, the Eastern occupier) is replaced by the good/bad
confrontation of village and the city. In Finnish film history, films we see
that village is something pure and innocent, while city is something where the
sins are. Kaurismäki also adds this confrontation to his film with Shemeikka`s
character who represents the city from which he is coming from (in the film it
is cleared out that is Helsinki, some famous objects as the Railway station or Sokos hotel are shown and used in the
narrative). Also social problems such as alcoholism or the position of woman in
the society are touched. Even though, Kaurismäki replaces the characters and
the narrative to 1970s, the universal and timeless ideas about love and the
human tragedy expressed in the novel are in the film. The director constructs
the characters from the clichés and by using cinematic simplification
(Marja, typical village girl dreaming about the prince and city life,
Shemeikka, typical don-juan), the inner dramas of characters` are expressed.
Especially Juho`s and Marja`s (after the moment when she realizes where she is
and that there is no escape), Shemeikka`s character doesn`t show any feelings
even in the moment of his death – he is dehumanized. Also in the Kaurismäki`s
film Juha`s line is changed – in the novel originally he suicides, in the
newest version he kills the seducer of his wife, but also after the fight dies
himself. Usually violence in Kaurismäki films is something what never leads to
good (vice versa than in Hollywood films – hero usually is the one who kills
the enemy), here Kaurismäki plays with the genre – on one hand, Juha becomes a
hero after making his revenge, on the other hand – he dies in the dump. This is
a kind of symbolic ethical deheroization of character – the character doesn`t
reach anything with the murder, by braking the rule of society and killing, he
automatically pushes himself out of society – becomes a dump for it.
The film
is also worth attention stylistically. Kaurismäki takes a challenge in story
telling and decides to make a silent film, accompanied by the music (not always
emphasizes the dramatic mood). There not a lot of dialogues and they appear in
the intertitles as it is usual for silent films. Also the Black & White
aesthetics is chosen. In the end of the film (the scenes in the brothel) we can
also find aesthetic references to Film Noir. The eras are mixed up – that`s
what is also usual for Kaurismäki. He plays with the melodramatic silent film
genre (that`s also as the village as a place for paradise is a reference to the
Finnish film history), he mocks at the genre playing with clichés.
The director is ironical not only with the form, but also with the content of
the film (f. e. The motive of a massive three-foot wrench to the engine). Even
though the human tragedy is depicted , so the film can be described as tragicomical.
The famous Finnish director Aki Kaurismäki is also known worldwide and he
brings the classical Finnish novel to cinemas in all the world. Even though he
uses some references to Finnish history, identity and films, his film
“Juha“ can be understood and well accepted worldwide (that can be proven by
mentioning the Berlinale Film Festival award the film got), mostly because of
the attractive film form and the universal human feelings depicted in the
novel.
Written for
my Finnish film class back in JYU, 2012
2013 m. vasario 12 d., antradienis
Miserablism in Frozen Land (2005) and Frozen City (2006)
The two films by Finnish
director Aku Louhimies “Frozen Land” and “Frozen City” tests the edges of the
dark human nature, shows the dark side of Finnish society and its social
problems both lack of hope and lightening elements and can be described as miserablistic.
“Frozen City” talks about a
man, a father, who works a taxi driver and whose wife one day just doesn`t come back from her holiday, so he takes care of their three children. When the wife is
finally back – it is clear that the couple can continue together, so they start
the process of divorce. Wife tries to make everything that the husband would
see the children less and less. That is the first thing what makes the main
character to feel oppressed and nervous, so it causes his impulsively rude and
violent behavior at his work and finally he loses the job. Then he has debts,
an irritating neighbor, finally, when he tries to pick up a woman in the bar –
she appears to be a prostitute and asks money, which he doesn`t have, he is
drunk and feels humiliated in all possible ways. All this leads to meaningless
violence. The film draws the psychological portrait of the protagonist by
placing him among nearly all the possible worst things that can happen for a
man – loss of family, job and freedom. The film depicts the crisis of men in
Finland (also as in a documentary “Steam of Life”). The shame of the character
is awakened and according to Finnish historian Juha Siltala, unemployment
causes the strongest feeling of shame for the Finnish men. Also social oppression
and closed modern city life causes the feeling of loneliness. The character is
left nearly without any hope. Just some in the end of the film after
unsuccessful attempt of a suicide when he lies in the jail hospital a sunshine
lights into his eyes.
In “Frozen Land” a school
teacher of literature is fired from his job due to the change of school profile
to the exact sciences. As a result, he spends his time drinking and fighting at
home with his son Niko. Finally, Niko is thrown out from home, he is hanging
around with his best friend Tuomas and Tuomas' girlfriend. He (while dazed from
drugs) forges a 500 € banknote and uses it at a pawnshop. The pawnshop owner
forks it over to a low-rent half-crook salesman named Isto… The is a story
constructed from sub-narratives (network narrative) and all of them are
connected that gives the impression that people`s fates are meaningfully
connected. All the events are devastating and totally pessimistic, “Frozen
Land” also doesn`t offer any hope until the end of the film when we see that
Niko was able to start a normal life. But he is the only one. The film gives
the idea that every wrong movement causes some other wrong one what leads to
violence, crime or disaster. Even though the film world is totally pessimistic
it leaves the ethical moral with a reference to The Decalogue that if the wrong
actions are not taken, there still is hope, light and also the way back (the
example of Niko).
So the both films mostly talk
about the lower part of society and its social problems as drugs or alcohol,
alienation of society, lack of solidarity, social oppression – the environment
that causes loneliness and the feeling of no way out. The film depicts the
total loss of paradise even though the action is taking place during the
economical boom. This can be seen as an opposition to Kaurismäki`s Proletariat
trilogy which also talks about the lower part of society and its problems
during the economical boom, but still there is much more hope and the paradise
is not lost, it is just “Shadows in Paradise”. We are left to judge what is
more objective to reality.
Written for my Finnish Cinema class back in JYU, 2012.
Užsisakykite:
Pranešimai (Atom)
